1)
Zitat von Jürgen Meier
QUESTION:
Do You plan to allow to make succesors after finalisation of routes?
This is analog of "Folge" command, but which can work for routes in full automation mode, using safe matrix.
ANSWER:
Probably not, it would not make much sense, because automatic routes are started by feedback contacts, so why start it when there is no train yet on its start field? Alternatively you could achieve a similar effect with virtual feedback conatcts.
Alles anzeigen
QUESTION:
If You have 2 or more free routes at one start contact which is ACTIVATED, how to select one route for one arriving route and another for other?
(for example, instant and alternative pass for train )
EXPLANATION:
As i understood, Commander do not make random selection, and always take first.
Therefore second route will be always idle.
Successor command would make easy to solve different combinations and set a desirable priority of routes at node Start-Destination contact.
2)
Zitat von Jürgen Meier
QUESTION:
Do You plan to implement specific routes where each of them will work for specified class of locos (Dampf, diesel, passenger, electric, local... or appointed list of locos)?
ANSWER:
Not on our priority list, but we might think about it when everything else is done.
QUESTION:
Please tell how to separate electric, local and freight routes, which using one start/destination contact? Some trains have different lengths and may havent pantograpsh, and must be branched from one common to appropriate ways! How to do it?
3)
Zitat von Jürgen Meier
QUESTION:
Do You plan to make traffic lights working not only from route commands but also from logic of occupancy detectors and turnout positions? This will allow to implement YELLOWs, where routes are fullfiled!
ANSWER:
Not on our priority list, but we might think about it when everything else is done.
QUESTION:
But how to realize Red-Yellow-Green trafic lights logic?
Please explain.
4)
Zitat von Jürgen Meier
QUESTION:
Do two commands having the same occupancy contact (for activation) work now at "on the way" KARTE?
Earlier, second of them was ignored. To overcome it, i joined s88 into ring, doubling their numbers!
ANSWER:
No, they are not designed that way. It would slow the performance of the automatic mode, if each and every feedback conatct had to manage a long list of commands. Maybe allowing "folge-fstr" command would be a solution, as it can start a route which will inculde all the commands. Not on the priority list, probably more than 6 fields (3 on-the-way contacts) would be done sooner (or instead of it).
EXPLANATION:
It's obviously that "ON THE WAY" commands must be executed instantly!
Please make assembler insertion in Your C language. It will improve performance 10 times or more!
Newertheless, At finalisation of braking (at stop sensor) loco must instantly execute TWO commands per ONE sensor:
1) shunt and
2) stop!
To do this i join s88 sequence to the ring, by soldering iron, connecting computer output to input of first module, and double s88 module numbers at COMMANDERs setup.
So that the same contact have 2 different numbers. So, it allow to execute TWO commands per ONE sensor.
But this doings make s88 2 times slowlier!
NEWERTHELESS the PERFORMANCE is still ENOUGH!
QUESTION:
Please allow to execute 2 commands per the same sensor, If it's difficult - don't change menus!
Simply, allow the following:
CONTACT 1
COMMAND LocoIdFMini
CONTACT 2
COMMAND LocoIdFStop
CONTACT2
COMMAND LocoIdF4=ON
You also can extend this menus, "1 command per 1 contact" up to 6 pairs! It would be enough at this time!
But, please allow executions all commands for repeating number of the same contact!
EXPLANATION:
From another hand:
Start of any other route will be delayed, if another route is executing "SWITCHING" field.
QUESTION:
COMMANDER cannot start exexution of route, when "switching" field of another route is under execution!
Is it right?
EXPLANATION:
Therefore, using FOLGE - fstr way, which You propose, my loco will not stop momentary and continue movement a long apart from turnouts, waiting when swiching field of another route will end, and then, waiting launching FOLGE fstr. Right?
QUESTION:
Do You plan to make COMMANDER be able to run more than 1 "switching" fields simultaneously, or run multiple routes in parallel independantly?
Please use Assembler language, C compiler for Arms is too non-optimal!
-----------
Thanks,
Vadim